Chapter 5 – Going Global: The Emerging Markets Deep Dive
We're excited to launch our new "Retiring with ETFs" mastery series, available free to all members! This comprehensive 8-week program delivers weekly episodes to help you master ETF investing for retirement. Don't miss out—once the series concludes, this valuable content will become exclusive to paid subscribers.
Subscribe to our newsletter today to secure your free access!
I spent years calling emerging markets "the future of growth." Then I watched my emerging markets ETF deliver 47% total returns while the S&P 500 delivered 210%. This chapter will include what I learned about international diversification—both its promise and its pain.
The theory of emerging markets investing sounds bulletproof: younger populations, faster economic growth, technological leapfrogging, and undervalued currencies should translate into superior investment returns. The reality has been far more complex and, frankly, disappointing.
Yet I maintain an 8% allocation to emerging markets through VWO (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF). This chapter explains why I persist with this underperforming asset class and how to think about international diversification in a world where American companies already operate globally.
The Emerging Markets Promise vs. Reality
When I first invested in emerging markets in 2016, the investment thesis seemed obvious. Here were countries with GDP growth rates of 4-7% annually, compared to the U.S.'s 2-3%. Younger populations meant more workers entering their prime earning years. Technology was allowing these countries to leapfrog developed world infrastructure.
The numbers looked compelling:
Emerging Markets Advantages (2016 Analysis):
GDP Growth: 5.2% average vs 2.1% for developed markets
Demographics: Median age of 29 vs 43 in developed countries
Urbanization: 54% urban vs 81% in developed (room for growth)
Valuations: P/E ratios 30% below developed market averages
Market Cap: Only 11% of global markets despite 35% of global GDP
The disconnect between economic fundamentals and market capitalization suggested massive opportunity.
The Brutal Reality Check
Here's what actually happened to my emerging markets investments:
VWO Performance:
Starting price (Jan 2015): $34.13
Ending price (Aug 2025): $51.53
Total return: 47.2%
Annualized return: 4.1%
Maximum drawdown: -52.5% (2008 crisis, -67.7% max ever)
Volatility: 21.7% annually (30-year data)
Meanwhile, SPY delivered:
Total return: 210.2%
Annualized return: 11.3%
Maximum drawdown: -20.0%
My emerging markets allocation was a significant drag on portfolio performance. A $10,000 investment in VWO became $14,720, while the same investment in SPY became $31,020.
Why Did Emerging Markets Disappoint?
Several factors conspired against EM performance during this period:
1. Dollar Strength
The U.S. dollar strengthened significantly from 2015-2022, hurting returns for dollar-based investors:
Chinese Yuan: -12% vs USD over the period
Indian Rupee: -28% vs USD (currently above 88)
Brazilian Real: -35% vs USD
Turkish Lira: -85% vs USD (extreme example)
When local stock markets gained 8% but currencies fell 15%, dollar investors lost money.
2. China's Economic Transition
China represents 28.6% of VWO, so China's problems became EM's problems:
Real Estate Crisis: Property sector collapse (Evergrande bankruptcy)
Regulatory Crackdowns: Tech companies, education sector, gaming restrictions
COVID Policies: Zero-COVID lockdowns hurt economic growth
Trade Wars: Tariffs and technology restrictions from the U.S.
Demographics: Aging population, declining birth rates
3. Commodity Cycle Downturn
Many EM countries export commodities that struggled during this period:
Oil Prices: Volatile but generally weak 2015-2020
Industrial Metals: Oversupply and China demand concerns
Agricultural Products: Strong dollar hurt commodity exporters
4. Rising U.S. Interest Rates
Higher U.S. rates made dollar-denominated assets more attractive:
Capital Flight: Money flowed from EM to U.S. Treasuries
Borrowing Costs: EM countries and companies faced higher funding costs
Currency Pressure: Higher rates strengthened the dollar vs EM currencies
5. Political and Policy Instability
EM countries faced more political uncertainty:
Brazil: Presidential impeachment, corruption scandals
Turkey: Authoritarian drift, currency controls
India: Demonetization disruption, GST implementation
South Africa: Political transitions, infrastructure challenges
Country-by-Country Analysis: Where My Money Actually Goes
Understanding VWO's country allocation helps explain both its struggles and potential opportunities:
China (28.6% of VWO) - The Complicated Giant
China is impossible to ignore in EM investing—it's the world's second-largest economy and VWO's largest holding.
What I Own in China (through VWO):
Technology: Tencent Holdings (4.4%), Alibaba Group (2.7%)
E-commerce: Alibaba, JD.com, Meituan (0.8%), PDD Holdings (0.9%)
Banking: China Construction Bank (1.0%), ICBC
Consumer: Xiaomi Corporation (1.2%)
China's Positive Trends:
EV Leadership: Dominates global electric vehicle production and battery technology
Technology Innovation: Leading in 5G, AI implementation, mobile payments
Manufacturing Excellence: Still the world's factory with improving automation
Infrastructure Investment: Massive spending on transportation, energy, digital infrastructure
Domestic Consumption: Growing middle class, urbanization continues
China's Risk Factors:
Government Interference: Regulatory crackdowns can destroy company value overnight
Real Estate Crisis: Property sector represents 25% of economy, major developers bankrupt
Demographics: Population decline starting, aging workforce
Geopolitical Tensions: Taiwan situation, trade wars, technology restrictions
Debt Levels: High corporate and local government debt burdens
My China Investment Approach: Accept the exposure through diversified EM index rather than trying to pick individual Chinese companies or time Chinese market cycles.
Taiwan (20.3% of VWO) - The Semiconductor Powerhouse
Taiwan's economy is dominated by semiconductor manufacturing:
Key Taiwan Holdings:
Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM): 9.5% of VWO - World's largest contract chip manufacturer
Hon Hai Precision (Foxconn): 0.7% - Electronics manufacturing for Apple and others
MediaTek: 0.7% - Mobile chip designer
Taiwan's Advantages:
Technology Leadership: Critical role in global semiconductor supply chain
High-Value Manufacturing: Advanced chip fabrication capabilities
Strategic Importance: Essential for global technology infrastructure
Taiwan's Risks:
Geopolitical Tensions: China claims Taiwan, U.S. military support uncertain
Semiconductor Cycle: Chip industry is highly cyclical
Supply Chain Concentration: Over-reliance on technology sector
Natural Disaster Risk: Earthquakes and typhoons can disrupt production
Taiwan's Small Size, Big Impact: Despite being 20% of VWO, Taiwan's semiconductor industry affects global technology supply chains.
India (20.0% of VWO) - The Demographic Dividend
India represents my highest conviction within emerging markets.
What I Own in India (through VWO):
Banking: HDFC Bank (1.3%), ICICI Bank (0.9%)
Energy: Reliance Industries (1.1%) - oil refining, petrochemicals, telecom
Technology Services: Infosys (0.6%), TCS
Telecom: Bharti Airtel (0.6%)
India's Compelling Story:
Demographics: Median age of 28, population still growing
Digital Infrastructure: Unified Payments Interface revolutionizing commerce
Technology Hub: Global center for IT services, growing domestic tech sector
English Language: Advantage in global services and technology
Democratic Institutions: Stable political system, rule of law
Manufacturing Growth: "Make in India" initiative attracting global companies
India's Challenges:
Infrastructure Gaps: Transportation, energy, urban planning still developing
Income Inequality: Benefits concentrated in urban, educated populations
Bureaucratic Complexity: Regulatory challenges for business operations
Environmental Issues: Air pollution, water scarcity in major cities
Currency Volatility: Rupee recently hit historic lows above 88 vs USD
India Performance: Indian stocks have been among the better performers in EM, but currency volatility and high valuations create ongoing risks.
Brazil (4.1% of VWO) - Natural Resources Giant
Major Brazilian Holdings:
Various commodity and financial companies
Consumer goods companies
Brazil's Strengths:
Natural Resources: Large agricultural and mining exports
Large Domestic Market: 200+ million population
Diversified Economy: Mix of commodities, manufacturing, services
Brazil's Limitations:
Political Instability: Frequent government changes affect policy
Currency Volatility: Real has been very volatile vs USD
Commodity Dependence: Economy tied to global commodity cycles
Infrastructure Challenges: Transportation and logistics bottlenecks
Sector Analysis: What Industries Drive EM Returns
Emerging markets have different sector compositions than developed markets:
Technology (28% of EM indices) - The Growth Engine
EM technology differs from U.S. tech:
Hardware Focus: Semiconductor manufacturing, electronics assembly
Local Platforms: Regional e-commerce, social media, fintech companies
Manufacturing: Contract manufacturing for global technology companies
Innovation Areas: Mobile payments, super apps, electric vehicles
Key EM Tech Companies:
Taiwan Semiconductor: Essential for AI chips, smartphone processors
Tencent: Chinese gaming, messaging, fintech super-app
Alibaba: Chinese e-commerce, cloud computing
Samsung Electronics: Global memory chips, smartphones
Technology Advantages in EM:
Lower Costs: Engineering talent costs 1/3 to 1/2 of U.S. levels
Market Access: Local companies understand local consumer preferences
Government Support: Many EM governments prioritize technology development
Leapfrogging: Can implement newest technologies without legacy constraints
Technology Risks in EM:
Regulatory Uncertainty: Government crackdowns on technology companies
Intellectual Property: Concerns about IP protection and technology transfer
Geopolitical Tensions: Trade wars affecting technology supply chains
Cyclical Nature: Hardware manufacturing is highly cyclical
Financials (22% of EM indices) - The Banking Story
EM financial sectors are dominated by banks rather than capital markets:
Banking Opportunities:
Financial Inclusion: Billions of people gaining access to banking services
Digital Banking: Mobile-first banking platforms in many EM countries
Economic Growth: Banks benefit from GDP growth and credit expansion
Interest Rate Environment: Many EM countries have higher interest rates than developed markets
Banking Risks:
Credit Quality: Economic downturns can cause loan losses
Currency Risk: Banks' local currency assets may decline in dollar terms
Regulatory Risk: Government interference in banking operations
Political Risk: Banks often affected by political instability
Consumer Discretionary (12% of EM indices) - The Rising Middle Class
Consumer companies benefit from growing middle classes:
Consumption Trends:
Urbanization: Rural populations moving to cities, changing consumption patterns
Income Growth: Rising disposable income in middle-class households
Brand Adoption: Local and international brands gaining market share
E-commerce Growth: Online shopping revolutionizing retail
Major EM Consumer Companies:
Alibaba: Chinese e-commerce platform
Tencent: Chinese entertainment and social media
Taiwan Semiconductor: Benefits from consumer electronics demand
Meituan: Chinese food delivery and local services
Consumer Risks:
Economic Sensitivity: Consumer spending vulnerable to economic downturns
Currency Impact: Local currency weakness reduces purchasing power
Competition: Intense competition between local and global brands
Regulatory Risk: Government policies affecting consumer industries
Currency Considerations: The Hidden Risk Factor
Currency movements can overwhelm stock market performance in emerging markets investing:
How Currency Risk Works
When I buy VWO, I'm effectively making currency bets on dozens of countries:
Example: Indian Investment
Suppose the stock appreciates by 10% in Indian rupees (INR). On the surface, this seems like a solid gain. However, if during the same period the Indian rupee depreciates by 15% against the U.S. dollar (USD), the currency loss can significantly erode the investment return when converted back to dollars.
To understand the net effect, we need to combine both the local asset performance and the currency movement. The 10% gain in INR is offset by the 15% drop in the value of the rupee. When you convert your investment back to USD, the rupee's depreciation means you get fewer dollars per rupee, reducing the overall value of your investment in dollar terms. Mathematically, the combined effect results in an approximate USD return of -6.5%. This means that despite the local market doing well, the investor actually incurs a loss due to unfavorable currency exchange rates.
This currency risk is unavoidable in international investing and adds significant volatility.
Major EM Currency Performance (2015-2025):
However, 2025 has seen a notable shift: The U.S. dollar has weakened about 10% year-to-date, providing tailwinds for EM currencies and helping drive VWO's strong 17.1% return through August 2025.
Currency Hedged EM ETFs
Some ETFs hedge currency risk:
DBEM: Deutsche Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged
HEEM: iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets
Hedged ETF Pros:
Reduces volatility from currency movements
Focuses returns on stock performance
Can outperform during dollar strength periods
Hedged ETF Cons:
Misses upside when EM currencies strengthen
Higher fees (typically 0.30-0.60% vs 0.08% unhedged)
Hedging isn't perfect, some currency exposure remains
Complex derivatives add counterparty risk
My Currency Approach: Accept currency risk as part of EM investing. Over long periods, currency movements partially offset each other, and hedging costs can exceed benefits.
The Diversification Debate: Do EM ETFs Actually Diversify?
The textbook case for emerging markets investing has always centered on diversification benefits—the idea that EM stocks move independently from developed markets, providing portfolio protection when U.S. markets struggle. But when you dig into the actual correlation numbers, the reality is far more nuanced and, frankly, disappointing.
The Correlation Reality Check
Looking at monthly returns from 2015 to 2025, the correlation between VWO and major U.S. ETFs tells a sobering story. VWO correlates 0.78 with SPY—meaning they move in the same direction roughly 78% of the time. The correlation with VTI sits at 0.76, while QQQ shows a 0.72 correlation with emerging markets.
To put these numbers in perspective, correlations above 0.70 are considered high in portfolio theory. When two assets correlate at 0.78, they're essentially moving together most of the time, providing limited diversification benefit. These correlations are significantly higher than historical averages, suggesting that globalization has fundamentally changed how emerging markets relate to developed market performance.
This isn't the diversification story that academic papers from the 1990s and early 2000s promised. Back then, EM correlations with U.S. markets often ranged from 0.40 to 0.60—providing genuine portfolio diversification. Today's correlations suggest you're getting much less diversification bang for your EM allocation buck.
When EM Correlations Break Down (In the Wrong Direction)
The cruel irony of modern EM correlations is that they tend to increase precisely when you need diversification most—during crisis periods. This is the opposite of what portfolio theory predicts and what investors desperately need.
During the COVID crash in March 2020, all global markets fell together in a coordinated selloff. VWO didn't provide a safe haven—it fell alongside SPY and VTI as investors fled to cash and Treasury bonds. The diversification benefit that emerging markets were supposed to provide during equity market stress simply evaporated when it was needed most.
The 2022 Federal Reserve rate hiking cycle created another example of correlations moving in the wrong direction. As the Fed aggressively raised rates to combat inflation, global "risk-off" sentiment hit all equity markets simultaneously. Emerging markets didn't benefit from being "different"—they suffered alongside developed markets as investors abandoned anything perceived as risky.
Even EM-specific crises can spread to developed markets, as we saw during the 2015-2016 China concerns. When Chinese markets wobbled and the yuan weakened, the contagion spread to global markets, demonstrating how interconnected modern financial systems have become. Instead of EM weakness being contained locally, it dragged down developed market performance too.
When EM Provides True Diversification
Despite these disappointing correlations, emerging markets do occasionally move independently from developed markets—but the timing is unpredictable and the periods are often brief.
Commodity booms represent one scenario where EM can truly shine independently. When oil, copper, gold, or agricultural prices surge, resource-rich emerging markets like Brazil, Russia, and South Africa can outperform dramatically while developed markets remain flat or even decline. These commodity cycles are driven by supply-and-demand dynamics that often have little to do with developed market equity performance.
Dollar weakness periods create another divergence opportunity, as we're witnessing in 2025. When the U.S. dollar weakens significantly, EM currencies strengthen, creating automatic return boosts for dollar-based investors that are completely independent of developed market stock performance. This currency effect can drive substantial EM outperformance during sustained dollar weakness cycles.
Local factors occasionally create genuine independence when country-specific events drive performance. Elections, policy changes, natural disasters, or breakthrough economic reforms in individual countries can move their markets independently of global trends. India's digital payment revolution, Brazil's agricultural productivity gains, or Taiwan's semiconductor boom can drive local outperformance regardless of what's happening in New York or London.
Sector rotation provides subtle diversification benefits because emerging markets have different sector weightings than developed markets. EM markets are more heavily weighted toward financials, materials, and energy, while developed markets tilt toward technology and healthcare. During periods when these sectors rotate in and out of favor, the different weightings can create performance divergence.
The Reality Check: Why Diversification Has Declined
The disappointing diversification reality reflects fundamental changes in how global markets operate compared to decades past.
Multinational corporations have reduced the need for direct EM exposure because U.S. companies already provide significant international revenue streams. When Apple generates 60% of its revenue internationally, McDonald's operates in 100+ countries, and Coca-Cola sells everywhere, owning SPY already gives you substantial emerging market economic exposure without the volatility and currency risk of direct EM investing.
Global supply chains have created economic interdependence that increases correlations across all markets. When a semiconductor shortage affects auto production, it impacts companies in Detroit, Stuttgart, Tokyo, and Mumbai simultaneously. Supply chain integration means economic shocks spread globally rather than remaining localized, reducing the independence of regional markets.
Financial market integration allows capital to flow more freely between markets than ever before. Modern technology enables institutional investors to buy and sell across global markets instantly, meaning that sentiment shifts, risk-on/risk-off moves, and liquidity crunches affect all markets simultaneously rather than sequentially.
Technology convergence has standardized how markets operate globally. Similar trading algorithms, risk management systems, and investment strategies are deployed across developed and emerging markets, creating synchronized responses to global events. When algorithmic trading systems trigger selling in New York, similar systems often trigger selling in Mumbai, São Paulo, and Shanghai simultaneously.
The Honest Assessment
This correlation analysis forces an uncomfortable conclusion: emerging markets provide less diversification today than historical data suggests. The 0.76-0.78 correlations with U.S. markets mean you're not getting dramatic diversification benefits from your EM allocation—you're essentially getting a higher-volatility, currency-exposed version of global equity exposure you could achieve through U.S. multinationals.
This doesn't necessarily mean eliminating EM entirely, but it does mean managing expectations about what diversification benefits you're actually receiving. Your 8% EM allocation isn't providing 8% worth of portfolio diversification—it's providing modest diversification with significantly higher volatility and complexity.
The key insight is treating EM as a satellite position for specific scenarios rather than a core diversifier. When those scenarios play out—dollar weakness, commodity booms, local outperformance—EM can provide meaningful portfolio benefits. But counting on consistent diversification benefits that may not materialize sets up disappointment and poor behavioral decisions.
Understanding these correlation realities helps maintain realistic expectations and proper position sizing, preventing EM from becoming either an outsized disappointment or an abandoned opportunity.
My EM Investment Strategy: Patience and Discipline
Despite historically disappointing performance, I maintain 8% EM allocation for several reasons.
Long-Term Demographic Tailwinds
EM demographics remain compelling compared to developed markets:
Younger populations mean:
More workers entering peak earning years
Higher consumption growth potential
More innovation and entrepreneurship
Less burden from aging-related expenses
Valuation Support
EM valuations remain attractive relative to developed markets:
P/E Ratio Comparison (2025):
U.S. Markets: 22x forward earnings
Emerging Markets: 15.5x forward earnings (VWO P/E ratio)
Discount: 30% cheaper than U.S. markets
This valuation discount provides some downside protection and upside potential if performance converges.
Technology Leapfrogging Continues
EM countries continue adopting new technologies faster:
Mobile Payments: China and India lead global adoption
Electric Vehicles: China dominates production and adoption
Digital Banking: Many EM countries have more advanced fintech
Renewable Energy: India and China leading solar/wind installation
My EM Allocation Rules
Target Allocation: 8% of total portfolio
Rebalancing Band: 6-10% (rebalance if outside this range)
Vehicle: VWO only (broad diversification, low cost)
Contributions: Include in monthly DCA to maintain weight
Time Horizon: 10+ years minimum
Review Period: Annual assessment of allocation appropriateness
Position Sizing Logic
Why 8% specifically?
Meaningful but not dominant: Large enough to benefit from EM outperformance, small enough to limit damage from underperformance
Risk budget allocation: Uses about 15% of my total portfolio risk budget
Behavioral sustainability: Small enough that poor performance doesn't cause sleepless nights
Rebalancing source: Provides diversification benefits during portfolio rebalancing
EM ETF Selection: VWO vs Alternatives
Why I Choose VWO:
Lowest fees: 0.08% expense ratio saves money over decades
Broadest diversification: 5,000+ holdings across 26 countries
Vanguard structure: Owned by investors, focuses on cost minimization
Track record: Established fund with long performance history
Behavioural Challenges of EM Investing
Emerging markets test investor patience more than any other asset class, creating unique psychological hurdles that have driven many investors to abandon their international allocations entirely.
Performance Disappointment
The most challenging aspect of emerging markets investing has been the relentless underperformance that creates a constant psychological drag on portfolio satisfaction. From 2015 to 2024, emerging markets significantly lagged developed markets, with VWO delivering barely positive returns while U.S. markets soared. This wasn't an isolated period of weakness—the previous decade from 2010 to 2020 also saw emerging markets struggle to keep pace with developed market returns.
The cumulative effect of two decades of disappointing performance has created what I call "investor fatigue"—a deep skepticism about whether emerging markets will ever deliver on their theoretical promise. I've watched countless investors start with enthusiasm about demographic trends and GDP growth rates, only to gradually reduce and eventually eliminate their EM allocations after years of watching their international holdings drag down overall portfolio performance. The psychological burden of owning an asset class that consistently underperforms creates a persistent sense that you're making a mistake, especially when friends and financial media constantly highlight U.S. market gains.
This disappointment is particularly acute because emerging markets often underperform during the exact periods when you most need portfolio diversification to work. Instead of zigging when developed markets zag, EM often falls even harder during global downturns, amplifying rather than cushioning portfolio volatility.
Volatility Management
Beyond underperformance, emerging markets subject investors to significantly higher volatility that can be emotionally exhausting. VWO's 21.7% annual volatility versus 16% for U.S. markets might seem like a modest difference on paper, but it translates into much larger daily swings that test psychological endurance. Where U.S. markets might move 1-2% on a typical day, emerging markets regularly experience 3-5% daily moves that can leave investors checking their portfolios obsessively.
During global crises, this volatility amplifies dramatically. Emerging markets don't just fall during worldwide selloffs—they often crater as investors flee to perceived safety in developed markets. The "risk-off" mentality that dominates crisis periods inevitably hurts EM disproportionately, as investors abandon anything perceived as risky or speculative. Currency swings add yet another layer of unpredictability that compounds the volatility from underlying stock movements. A 5% gain in local currency terms can become a 3% loss in dollar terms if the local currency weakens against the dollar, creating a double-whammy effect that U.S. investors don't face with domestic holdings.
News Flow Sensitivity
Perhaps most frustrating is how heavily emerging markets performance depends on headline risks that feel largely outside an investor's control or prediction ability. Political developments in countries thousands of miles away can trigger significant portfolio swings that have little to do with underlying business fundamentals. Elections, policy changes, corruption scandals, and regulatory crackdowns create constant headline risk that keeps EM investing feeling more like geopolitical speculation than long-term wealth building.
Economic data releases from major emerging markets can move global EM indices dramatically, as investors extrapolate single data points into broad narratives about entire regions. A disappointing GDP reading from China or an unexpected inflation spike in India can trigger selling across all emerging markets, regardless of individual country fundamentals. Global factors beyond any emerging market's control—such as U.S. dollar strength, commodity price swings, or Federal Reserve policy changes—often drive EM performance more than local economic conditions, making it feel like you're betting on macro trends rather than investing in businesses.
My Behavioral Management System
Given these psychological challenges, I've developed a systematic approach that removes emotional decision-making from my emerging markets allocation. The cornerstone is maintaining a fixed 8% allocation that doesn't change based on recent performance, headlines, or my feelings about international markets. This predetermined allocation size removes the temptation to increase exposure after good performance or abandon the allocation entirely after disappointing periods. By treating the 8% as a permanent portfolio component rather than a tactical bet, I avoid the behavioral trap of constantly second-guessing the allocation.
Dollar-cost averaging provides another behavioral anchor by automating monthly contributions regardless of performance or news flow. Whether VWO is up 20% or down 30%, the same dollar amount gets invested monthly, removing any decisions about timing or market conditions. This systematic approach has the added benefit of buying more shares when prices are depressed and fewer shares when prices are elevated, naturally implementing a "buy low, sell high" discipline that's difficult to execute manually.
My long-term focus of 10+ years helps filter out the constant noise that makes emerging markets investing so psychologically challenging. When I evaluate EM performance, I look at multi-year periods rather than quarterly or annual results, which helps maintain perspective during inevitable periods of underperformance. This extended time horizon also aligns with the fundamental reasons for owning emerging markets—demographic trends, economic development, and technology adoption that play out over decades rather than years.
Rebalancing discipline provides the most counterintuitive but powerful behavioral tool in my EM management system. When emerging markets underperform and fall below my 8% target weight, I buy additional shares to restore the allocation. When they outperform and exceed the target, I sell excess shares back to 8%. This systematic rebalancing forces me to buy more when EM is unpopular and sell when it's performing well, implementing a disciplined contrarian approach that goes against natural emotional impulses.
Finally, limiting the position size to 8% of total portfolio creates psychological protection that makes all the other behavioral tools possible. Knowing that even if emerging markets went to zero, I would only lose 8% of my portfolio wealth, makes it much easier to maintain discipline during difficult periods. The limited position size transforms EM from a potentially portfolio-threatening allocation into a manageable speculation that can be held through multiple cycles without threatening core financial goals.
Future Scenarios: When EM Might Outperform
Several scenarios could lead to emerging markets outperformance—and we're already seeing glimpses of this potential in 2025's strong EM returns.
Dollar Weakness Cycle
The most immediate catalyst for EM outperformance is U.S. dollar weakness, which we're witnessing in real-time during 2025. When the dollar weakens, it creates multiple tailwinds for emerging markets that compound each other.
Currency tailwinds provide the most direct benefit—as EM currencies strengthen against the dollar, dollar-based investors automatically see improved returns even if local stock markets remain flat. A 10% strengthening of the Chinese yuan or Indian rupee translates directly into 10% better returns for U.S. investors, regardless of underlying company performance.
Commodity benefits amplify this effect because many emerging markets are major commodity exporters. A weaker dollar typically drives commodity prices higher in dollar terms, boosting the revenues and stock prices of Brazilian mining companies, Russian energy firms, and South African resource exporters. This creates a double benefit—stronger local currencies and higher commodity-driven earnings.
Capital flows shift dramatically during dollar weakness cycles. International investors start looking beyond U.S. assets for returns, driving money into EM stocks and bonds. This increased demand creates a virtuous cycle where rising prices attract more investors, further strengthening EM performance. The "risk-on" mentality that accompanies dollar weakness typically benefits emerging markets disproportionately, just as "risk-off" periods hurt them more than developed markets.
Valuation reversion becomes compelling when EM trades at significant discounts to developed markets—as it does currently. When EM stocks trade at 30% lower P/E ratios than U.S. stocks, even modest improvement in sentiment can drive substantial outperformance as valuations normalize.
U.S. Market Maturation
America's economic maturation could fundamentally shift the growth advantage toward emerging markets over the coming decades. Lower U.S. growth rates seem increasingly likely as the economy matures—historical 3% GDP growth may decline to 1-2% annually due to demographic headwinds, high debt levels, and reduced productivity gains from mature industries.
Meanwhile, EM's growth advantage becomes more pronounced as these economies industrialize and urbanize. When emerging markets consistently grow at 4-6% annually while the U.S. struggles to exceed 2%, that growth differential eventually shows up in corporate earnings and stock performance. It's basic math—companies operating in faster-growing economies have more opportunities to expand revenues and profits.
The demographic dividend in emerging markets stands in stark contrast to aging developed economies. While the U.S. median age approaches 38 and birth rates fall below replacement levels, countries like India maintain median ages in the twenties with growing working-age populations. More workers entering their prime earning years means more consumption, more tax revenue, and more economic dynamism—all of which benefit local companies and stock markets.
Technology Convergence
The assumption that U.S. companies will perpetually dominate global technology is increasingly questionable as EM tech capabilities mature rapidly.
China's AI development represents perhaps the most significant challenge to U.S. tech dominance. Chinese companies like Baidu, Alibaba, and ByteDance aren't just copying American innovations—they're developing competitive AI technologies, massive language models, and autonomous systems that rival anything produced in Silicon Valley. If Chinese AI companies achieve technological parity or superiority in key areas, their stocks could dramatically outperform U.S. tech giants.
India's software services dominance already demonstrates how emerging markets can lead entire technological sectors. Companies like Tata Consultancy Services, Infosys, and Wipro don't just provide cheaper alternatives to U.S. tech services—they often deliver superior solutions with better global reach. India's combination of English-language skills, technical expertise, and cost advantages has created genuine competitive moats that benefit investors.
Local platform advantages give EM companies inherent benefits in understanding and serving their domestic markets. While American companies struggle to penetrate Chinese social media or Indian e-commerce effectively, local champions like Tencent, Alibaba, and Reliance Digital dominate their home markets and expand regionally. These companies often understand local preferences, regulatory environments, and cultural nuances better than foreign competitors ever could.
Infrastructure Investment Cycle
Massive infrastructure spending across emerging markets could drive a sustained period of economic growth and stock market outperformance.
China's Belt and Road Initiative represents the largest infrastructure investment program in human history, spanning dozens of countries across Asia, Africa, and Latin America. This isn't just about Chinese companies—it's creating demand for commodities, construction services, and industrial equipment across participating emerging markets. The multiplier effects of this infrastructure spending could drive EM growth for decades.
India's infrastructure push under various government initiatives is transforming transportation, energy, and urban development across the world's most populous country. Building highways, airports, power plants, and digital infrastructure creates immediate economic activity and long-term productivity gains that compound over time. Indian infrastructure and industrial companies are primary beneficiaries of this massive capital deployment.
The green energy transition happening globally is being led by emerging markets in many key areas. China dominates solar panel manufacturing, battery production, and electric vehicle assembly. India is installing renewable energy capacity at unprecedented rates. These countries aren't just benefiting from the global shift to clean energy—they're leading it, creating competitive advantages that could persist for decades.
The Convergence Effect
These scenarios aren't mutually exclusive—they could occur simultaneously, creating compounding effects that drive sustained EM outperformance. A weaker dollar combined with infrastructure spending, technological advancement, and demographic advantages could create a perfect storm of EM opportunity that lasts years rather than quarters.
The key insight is that mean reversion works both ways. Just as emerging markets can underperform for extended periods, they can also outperform when conditions align. The same factors that made EM investing painful for the past decade—currency weakness, commodity cycles, geopolitical uncertainty—could reverse and become powerful tailwinds.
For patient investors with proper position sizing, these scenarios represent exactly why maintaining a small but persistent EM allocation makes sense. You don't need to predict which scenario will unfold or when—you just need to be positioned to benefit if any of them occur while limiting downside if they don't.
Key Takeaways: The Patient EM Strategy
After a decade of disappointing EM performance and extensive analysis, here are my key insights:
The Hard Truths About EM Investing
Past decade performance has been genuinely disappointing. VWO's 4.1% annual returns vs SPY's 11.3% represent a significant opportunity cost, though 2025 has shown EM can outperform when conditions align.
Correlations with developed markets are higher than historical averages. Globalization has reduced diversification benefits, making EM less effective as a portfolio diversifier than academic theory suggests.
Currency risk is a significant factor for dollar-based investors. EM currency movements have been a major factor in returns—both negative (2015-2022) and positive (2025 YTD with dollar weakness).
Timing EM cycles is extremely difficult. Political, economic, and currency factors create unpredictable performance patterns that resist forecasting.
The Reasons to Persist
Demographics remain compelling over multi-decade timeframes. Younger populations, urbanization trends, and growing middle classes provide fundamental growth drivers that developed markets lack.
Valuations offer margin of safety. Trading at 30% discount to U.S. markets provides downside protection and upside potential if performance converges.
Technology adoption continues accelerating. EM countries often implement new technologies faster than developed markets, potentially creating competitive advantages.
Diversification benefits may return. Current high correlations might be temporary—diversification tends to work over very long periods even if it fails for extended stretches.
Implementation Strategy
Allocation Size: 5-10% maximum—enough to participate in potential outperformance, small enough to limit damage from continued underperformance
Vehicle Choice: Broad, diversified, low-cost ETFs (VWO) rather than country-specific or sector-specific bets
Time Horizon: Minimum 10+ years required—EM investing requires extraordinary patience
Behavioral Discipline: Systematic rebalancing and dollar-cost averaging to remove emotional decision-making
Review Schedule: Annual allocation review but resist frequent adjustments based on recent performance
The Bottom Line on EM Investing
Emerging markets represent the most challenging component of my portfolio—intellectually compelling but practically volatile. The demographic and economic fundamentals support long-term optimism, but the execution risks and currency headwinds create ongoing challenges.
My 8% allocation reflects this tension: large enough to benefit if EM delivers on its promise, small enough to survive if it continues disappointing. This isn't a high-conviction position—it's a hedge against missing the next decade of global growth.
For investors considering EM exposure, the key questions are:
Can you maintain discipline through extended underperformance?
Do you have a truly long-term investment horizon (10+ years)?
Can you limit position size to levels that won't cause behavioral mistakes?
Do you believe demographic trends eventually overcome short-term challenges?
If you answer "no" to any of these questions, skip emerging markets and focus on U.S. multinational corporations that already provide global revenue exposure without the complexity and volatility of direct EM investment.
The next chapter explores the opposite end of the risk spectrum: Treasury bonds and stability assets that provide portfolio ballast during equity market turbulence while creating rebalancing opportunities and inflation protection.
Next: Chapter 6 will examine Treasury ETFs, TIPS, and bond strategies that balance equity risk while providing downside protection and rebalancing opportunities.
Sign up now and get our free REITs’ Numerical Ratings.
Disclaimer: This article constitutes the author’s personal views and is for entertainment and educational purposes only. It is not to be construed as financial advice in any form. Please do your own research and seek advice from a qualified financial advisor. From time to time, I have positions in all or some of the mentioned stocks when publishing this article. This is a disclosure - not a recommendation to buy or sell stocks.